Electronic Signal Calibrant
Although internal and external calibrants are the main methods used to quantify your NMR sample, a newer method exists. This method is referred to as Electronic Reference To access In-vivo Concentration (ERETIC).[1] Rather than spiking the sample with a specific amount of calibrant, ERETIC introduces a new resonance using a signal generated from another channel in the NMR spectrometer. There are many advantages to using ERETIC. If employed properly, ERETIC can present both accurate and precise values when compared to the expected value of the sample. Since ERETIC generates an electronic signal, it is possible to adjust the intensity of this signal as well as its chemical shift in the spectrum, allowing for the quantification of virtually any sample. ERETIC shows great promise, however, only a few literature studies have utilized this new technique.[3]
Selecting a Calibrant for the Perfect Combination
When selecting a qNMR calibrant, there are a few things that should be kept in mind in order to achieve accurate and precise results.
1. The calibrant should be of high purity. By using high purity calibrants, less overlap will occur due to impurities.
2. The calibrant should be non-hygroscopic and non-volatile. Compounds that are hygroscopic or volatile are hard to weigh out and as a result, increases error when trying to determine mass.
3. The calibrant should be free of water. Having any residual water in the calibrant will affect the baseline of the spectrum.
4. The calibrant should be small and symmetric. This allows the calibrant to have minimal signals and thus reduces the chances of overlapping signals.
5. The calibrant should be soluble in multiple deuterated solvents. This allows for a wider range of potential combinations.
There are traceable certified calibrants available on the market for
1H qNMR experiments.
[4] 19F and
31P qNMR reference materials are also available but there aren’t as many options available.
Once a suitable calibrant is found, it is important to ensure that the solvent, the sample, and the calibrant are compatible with one another. When I talk about compatibility, I am referring to their stability and how inert the calibrant, the sample, and the solvent are towards one another. To check their compatibility, it is recommended that you run NMR experiments at time 0 and repeat these experiments throughout an extended period to ensure no unexpected reactivity occurs.
[4] General knowledge of reactivity between functional groups will be quite helpful for this step. When checking for compatibility, one should also make sure that the signals of interest are distinct and have no overlaps with other signals. It is quite common to have to try multiple systems before finding the desired setup.
Hopefully this blog post has given you some insight on how to choose an appropriate calibrant as well as the differences between different kind of calibrants.