Proton (1H) remains the most widely used nuclide for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), however, heteronuclear NMR certainly has its niche and uses. In today’s blog, I will be talking about 13C quantitative NMR (qNMR). It is not as common of a nuclide to use in qNMR studies due to the inherent difficulties as compared to 1H qNMR. When conducting a qNMR experiment, the T1 relaxation times need to be considered in order to obtain accurate integrations. Typically, an interscan delay of ~5 times the longest T1 would be chosen to allow the full relaxation (or a very close approximation!) of the signals of interest. However, unlike 1H resonances, 13C resonances typically experience much longer T1 times. Additionally, due to the natural abundance of 13C (1.1%) compared to 1H (99.98%), these experiments often take much longer to perform, as more scans are required to build a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for accurate integrations. Another consideration for 13C qNMR is the nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE), which can lead to confusion when choosing a decoupling mode.1 If you would like to read more on which decoupling mode to choose, please read our previous post here and expect a follow-up describing the NOE in the near future!
In this study, analogous to a previous blog post by Glenn Facey, I analyzed acetone neat using a 0 second scan delay, 10 second scan delay, and lastly, after adding 5 mg of chromium(III) acetylacetonate, Cr(acac)3. This paramagnetic metal complex is used in NMR studies as a relaxation agent.1 Acetone has the molecular formula (CH3)2CO, which contains 2 types of carbon environments that we would expect to integrate to a 1:2 ratio. Shown in Figure 1a and Figure 1b are 13C{1H} NMR spectra of acetone using a 0 second delay and 10 second delay, respectively. Evidently, we observe inaccurate integration ratios for both spectra with ratios of 0.6:2 in Figure 1a and 0.7:2 in Figure 1b, indicating that a 10 second scan delay is still insufficient.