As technologies for improving chemical processes continue to evolve, traditional chemistry has started moving towards more automated approaches, with the goal of synthesizing, analyzing, and purifying chemicals in a continuous manner. This transition towards automation would allow chemists to focus on planning, interpreting data, developing more projects and an additional focus on technical work. One approach used to move towards automation is the implementation of flow chemistry. Compared to traditional batch mode chemistry, flow chemistry continuously introduces reagents into the flow reactor, while the products are continuously eluted from the flow reactor. However, a prerequisite of flow chemistry is to have a good analytical method that can conduct rapid, reproducible, and efficient analysis so that one can modify and optimize the reaction conditions. In this blog post, I’ll feature work done by Vilela et al. with the NMReady-60 and illustrate how it can be used for on-line reaction monitoring and to optimize reaction conditions for the generation of singlet oxygen using BODIPY photosensitisers.
In this experiment the capabilities of a range of photosensitizing BODIPY derivatives to form singlet oxygen for the oxidation of a-terpinene to ascaridole (Figure 1) was compared between flow and traditional batch mode chemistry. The key step for the formation of ascaridole is the formation of a triplet electronic excited state (T1) of the BODIPY derivative photosensitizers. This is done through an intersystem conversion (ISC) from the singlet excited state (S1) upon absorption of a photon. The system then undergoes a triplet-triplet annihilation (TTA) energy transfer process which results in an excited state singlet oxygen and ground state BODIPY photosensitizers. However, this TTA process is in competition with phosphorescent radiant decay (hvp) to revert the photosensitizer to its ground state, but the former is observed to occur more rapidly.